In today’s digital age, recording a private conversation is as easy as tapping an icon on your phone. But while the technology is simple, the legal risk in Florida is immense. Unlike many other states, Florida has stringent privacy protections, making it one of the most cautious places in the U.S. when it comes to electronic eavesdropping.

Understanding Florida’s “two-party consent” law isn’t just a matter of legal curiosity—it’s essential for anyone who wants to ensure their recordings are admissible evidence in a future lawsuit, or simply to avoid serious criminal charges.

What is the Rule for Recording Conversations in Florida?

Florida is categorized as an “All-Party Consent” state under its Security of Communications Act (Florida Statutes $\S 934.03$).

This means that, as a general rule, you must secure the permission of every person participating in the communication before you can legally record it. If you fail to get universal consent, you could be committing a crime, even if you are an active participant in the conversation yourself.

The core principle is the protection of an individual’s reasonable expectation of privacy. If a party to a conversation believes their words are private, the law protects their right not to be recorded without their knowledge.

The Critical Exceptions: When Consent Isn’t Required

While the law is strict, there are specific, limited circumstances where recording is permissible without the consent of all parties:

• Explicit Consent of All Parties: This is the safest and most straightforward path. If every person involved agrees to the recording in advance, it is legal.

• Public Setting Conversations: If the conversation occurs in a public place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g., a public speech, shouting across a crowded street, or a meeting that is clearly open to the public), recording is generally allowed.

• Law Enforcement and Investigative Purposes: State and federal law enforcement agencies have specific exemptions to conduct surveillance and record communications as part of their official duties, provided they have proper authorization or court orders.

• Protecting a Minor from Harm: The law carves out an exception for recording oral communications that involve an unlawful sexual act or an act of physical force or violence against a child under 18, provided the child is a party to the communication.

The Heavy Price: Penalties for Unlawful Recording

The penalties for violating Florida’s wiretapping law are severe and can include both criminal prosecution and civil liability.

Criminal Consequences

• First-Degree Misdemeanor: For a first-time offense where the recording was not used for illegal gain, the penalty can include up to one year in county jail and a fine of up to $1,000.

• Third-Degree Felony: If the recording is shared, used for commercial gain, or involves other aggravating factors, it can be elevated to a felony charge, carrying a potential sentence of up to five years in state prison and a $5,000 fine.

Civil Liability (Invasion of Privacy)

An individual whose privacy was violated by an illegal recording can file a civil lawsuit for damages. If successful, the violator may be ordered to pay the victim:

• Statutory damages of $1,000, or $100 for each day of the violation, whichever amount is greater.

• Punitive damages (intended to punish the wrongdoer).

• Attorney’s fees and court costs associated with the litigation.

Using the Recording: Admissibility in a Florida Court

Securing a recording legally is only the first hurdle; the second is convincing a Florida court to allow it as evidence.

Crucially, a conversation that was recorded illegally is almost always deemed inadmissible in court. Florida courts have consistently barred such evidence, even in cases involving serious crimes, upholding the core principle that illegal evidence cannot be used to secure a legal result.

Requirements for a Lawful Recording to be Admissible

Even if a conversation was recorded with all-party consent, it must still satisfy the Florida Rules of Evidence. The party seeking to introduce the recording must be able to properly authenticate the evidence by demonstrating:

1. Proper Device Operation: The recording equipment was functioning correctly at the time of the communication.

2. Competent Operator: The person operating the recording device did so in a proper, reliable manner.

3. Accuracy and Integrity: The recording is a true, accurate, and unaltered representation of the conversation.

4. Voice Identification: The person or persons speaking on the recording are reliably identified.

Typically, the person who made the recording or had direct knowledge of the device’s function will testify to meet the first three requirements. The speaker’s identity can be confirmed through voice recognition testimony, circumstantial evidence, or other established means.

Next Steps

Florida’s strict privacy laws mean that attempting to record a conversation without full consent is a high-risk proposition with potentially life-altering criminal and civil penalties. If you are involved in a situation where a key conversation needs to be documented, or if you suspect you have been recorded without your permission, you need experienced legal counsel.

The admissibility of evidence in your case could hinge entirely on the legality of a single audio file.

Are you unsure about the legality of a recording you possess, or do you believe your private conversations have been illegally intercepted? Contact William Cooper Law. for a confidential consultation to understand your rights and legal options.

The post Florida’s Wiretapping Law: A High-Stakes Guide to Legally Recording Conversations appeared first on William Cooper Law..

Artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly becoming a vital tool for modern businesses, streamlining everything from data analysis to content creation. While the efficiency gains are undeniable, the use of AI introduces complex legal and compliance risks that business owners must pay attention to, and address properly.

Core Areas of Exposure Plus Data Protection

Understanding where your company is vulnerable is the first step toward responsible AI integration. AI systems require and process vast quantities of data, which often includes sensitive personal or confidential information. If the data used for training or processed by your AI tools is not handled in compliance with laws like the GDPR or CCPA, your business faces significant exposure. Mismanagement or a security vulnerability could lead to serious data breaches, regulatory penalties, and a damaged public reputation.

Intellectual Property (IP) Infringement

Generative AI tools are largely diverse datasets that can contain copyrighted material. If your AI-generated output is substantially similar to an existing work, or if the underlying training data was not properly licensed, your company could be subject to infringement lawsuits.

This risk applies to text, images, code, and other creative outputs. The legal framework is still evolving, making proactive IP audits critical to your success.

Ambiguous Liability and Discrimination

When an AI system makes a mistake, the question of legal liability becomes complex. If an algorithm delivers flawed advice that causes a financial loss or if a system’s inherent bias (from the training data) leads to discriminatory outcomes in hiring or loan applications, who is responsible? The company, the software vendor, or the developer? Courts are increasingly holding companies accountable for automated discriminatory decisions, rejecting arguments that blame the algorithm itself.

Best Practices for Mitigation

To safeguard your operations and demonstrate due diligence, you must establish robust governance around your AI use:

• Vendor Due Diligence: Thoroughly vet all AI vendors and closely examine their terms of service regarding data ownership, IP indemnification, and liability.
• Establish Clear Policies: Create internal guidelines that define acceptable AI use, especially for tasks involving sensitive data or critical business decisions.
• Implement Human Oversight: Document a process for human review of AI-driven decisions. This demonstrates that algorithms are not operating with unchecked autonomy, which can be essential in managing fiduciary duty and negligence claims.
• Audit for Bias: Conduct regular data and algorithm audits to identify and mitigate biases that could lead to non-compliant or discriminatory outcomes.

William Cooper Law: Your Partner in AI Governance

The integration of AI is not a question of if, but how. The complexity and rapid pace of regulatory changes from data privacy rules to new guidelines on algorithmic transparency. Legal compliance is an ongoing, strategic challenge.

The team at William Cooper Law provides the expertise necessary to turn this complexity into a competitive advantage. Our experienced general counsel and legal engineers can:

• Develop Bespoke AI Governance Frameworks that align with your specific business model and risk tolerance.
• Review and Draft Vendor Contracts to ensure optimal protections against liability, data breaches, and IP claims.
• Conduct Regulatory Risk Assessments to identify and close gaps in compliance with evolving global data and bias regulations.
• Don’t let legal uncertainty slow down your innovation. Partner with William Cooper Law to ensure your AI strategy is both cutting-edge and legally sound.

Don’t let legal uncertainty slow down your innovation. Contact William Cooper Law today to ensure your AI strategy is both cutting-edge and legally sound for long-term success and peace of mind.

The post Navigating the AI Frontier: Legal Essentials for Your Business Operations appeared first on William Cooper Law..

Starting a business always begins with a foundational, critical decision: choosing the right legal entity structure. For most entrepreneurs, the Limited Liability Company (LLC) is ideal, offering a mix of liability protection and simplicity.

But what happens when your business booms and starts acquiring significant assets? A single LLC might no longer cut it. This leads to a sophisticated question many growing companies deal with: Can one LLC actually own another? The short answer is a definitive yes.

This business setup is called a parent-subsidiary structure. Think of it like a family. The Parent LLC is the main, controlling company—it owns and acts as the only member of the smaller, newly created Subsidiary LLCs. This arrangement isn’t a mere loophole; it’s a smart risk management strategy that organizes your ventures under one umbrella while keeping their liabilities strictly separate.

What Makes the LLC an Excellent Foundation?

An LLC is essentially a flexible business entity recognized by the state. Its greatest benefit is the protective shield it grants its owners, known as members. Like a corporation, an LLC protects the members’ personal assets from the company’s debts and obligations.

It also enjoys the benefit of pass-through taxation, similar to a partnership. This means the company’s profits and losses are reported directly on the members’ personal tax returns, allowing you to avoid the “double taxation” that often hits C-corporations.

To get started, members file Articles of Organization with the state and draft an essential Operating Agreement that defines management roles, member responsibilities, and decision-making rules.

The Power of a Parent-Subsidiary Structure

Structuring your business so one LLC owns its subsidiaries provides several advantages, most of which center on isolating risk / clarity.

• Enhanced Liability Isolation: This is the core benefit. By keeping distinct business ventures or high-value assets in separate subsidiary LLCs, you build a legal wall around each one. If a subsidiary faces a major lawsuit or goes bankrupt, its liability is typically contained to its own assets, shielding the parent company and all other subsidiaries. This is vital for real estate holdings or companies in high-risk industries.
• Targeted Asset Protection: You can place specific, valuable assets like intellectual property, specialized equipment, or key real estate into their own subsidiary LLCs (often called holding companies).
• Operational Autonomy: The parent LLC holds ultimate control, but each subsidiary can be set up with its own management team, employees, and specific operating agreement. This enables decentralized, specialized management of different business lines or properties, while the parent can focus on the big-picture strategy.
• Simplified Ownership and Investment: Consolidating overall control under a single parent LLC can simplify the structure for the founders. Plus, if you want to bring in outside investors, you could offer them a stake in one high-growth subsidiary without giving them a claim on the entire corporate umbrella.

Navigating the Challenges and Complexities

While beneficial, this multi-entity structure adds administrative and legal hurdles that demand meticulous attention. The most common challenge is the strict requirement for separate corporate formalities. For instance, if the parent LLC uses its funds to regularly pay the subsidiary’s bills, a court could later view them as a single entity, allowing a creditor to “pierce the corporate veil” and sue the parent.

Administratively, each subsidiary must hold its own annual meetings and keep its own minute book separate from the parent’s, a detail often overlooked by small business owners.

Increased Administrative Load

The sheer number of entities requires a rigorous commitment to compliance. Each LLC must:

• Maintain its own separate books and financial records.
• Secure its own Employer Identification Number (EIN).
• Have distinct business bank accounts.
• File its own annual reports and fees with the state.
• Strictly comply with its Operating Agreement.

***Crucial Note: Failing to maintain this separation could expose the parent and all other subsidiaries to the liability of a single subsidiary.

Complex Tax Implications

The parent subsidiary structure can complicate tax filings. A single member subsidiary 100% owned by the parent is often treated as a “disregarded entity” for federal tax purposes; its income and expenses are simply reported on the parent’s tax return. As the structure grows and if ownership percentages vary, tax strategies can quickly become intricate, requiring careful planning to avoid pitfalls.

This intricacy deepens if a subsidiary has multiple members which would typically require the subsidiary to file its own separate IRS Form 1065 (Partnership Return), rather than being disregarded.

Higher Costs

Simply put, you’ll have more fees. Each LLC requires its own initial filing fee, annual renewal fees, and potentially separate registered agent costs. The necessity of specialized legal and accounting services to correctly set up and maintain the structure also adds to the overall expense.

Conclusion: The Necessity of Expert Guidance

The decision to utilize an LLC to own one or more subsidiary LLCs is a powerful, strategic move for scaling businesses and sophisticated investors. It provides an unmatched level of asset and liability protection by segmenting risk, but it is not a passive solution. The benefits hinge entirely on the meticulous, ongoing adherence to legal formalities and a sophisticated understanding of the tax landscape.

At William Cooper Law., we specialize in developing and implementing robust business structures that align with your specific growth and risk mitigation goals. Don’t navigate the complexities of multi-entity ownership alone. Check out our LLC Formation Checklist to ensure you have everything to need to start a new business.

Contact us today to ensure your parent-subsidiary LLC structure is established correctly and maintained diligently for long-term success and peace of mind.

The post Strategic Structuring: The Power of an LLC Owning Another LLC appeared first on William Cooper Law..

In the age of smartphones and readily available technology, capturing audio has become effortless. However, the ease of recording a phone call or an in-person discussion does not negate the complex web of state and federal laws that govern the practice. Violating wiretapping statutes can lead to severe penalties, including potential criminal prosecution and substantial civil lawsuits. Furthermore, a recording, even if obtained legally, might still be rejected as evidence in court. For New Yorkers asking, “Can you record a conversation in NY?” – understanding the legal landscape is vital.

New York State Law: One-Party Consent

New York operates under the one-party consent rule. This is a critical distinction that determines the legality of most recordings.

Essentially, if you are participating in the conversation—whether it’s a telephone call or an in-person meeting—you have the legal authority to record it, even if the other parties are unaware or haven’t explicitly consented. The moment you capture an audio conversation in which you are not a participant, you are breaking the law.

Unlawfully recording a private communication in New York is classified as a Class E felony, which carries significant punishment, including a maximum of four years in state prison and a fine of up to $5,000.

Federal Law

Federal law largely mirrors New York’s stance on consent, adhering to the same one-party standard. You are legally permitted to record a private communication so long as you are one of the participants.

A breach of federal wiretapping statutes is a serious offense, potentially resulting in up to five years in federal prison and criminal fines reaching $250,000 for an individual. Beyond criminal charges, offenders also face civil repercussions, which can include compensatory damages, payment of the plaintiff’s attorney’s fees, and punitive damages.

Interstate Telephone Conversations

The complexity of recording law multiplies when a phone conversation involves individuals located in different states. Because some jurisdictions operate under two-party (or all-party) consent rules, determining which state’s law applies becomes a difficult legal question when laws clash.

When faced with conflicting laws, a court will weigh the facts of the case to decide which law governs. In situations where multiple states are involved, the court often defaults to applying federal law, which, as stated above, is the one-party consent standard.

When is a Recorded Conversation Admissible as Evidence?

A recording’s legality is the first hurdle: any conversation obtained illegally under wiretapping laws is automatically inadmissible in a New York courtroom. Learn more about the New York State Law regarding phone recordings.

The next significant obstacle for a legally recorded conversation is the Hearsay Rule. Hearsay generally blocks out-of-court statements from being used in court to prove the truth of an assertion made in the statement. For example, a legally recorded conversation in which one person says, “I stole the missing money,” would typically be inadmissible as proof that they stole the money.

Nevertheless, many crucial exceptions to the Hearsay Rule exist under both New York state and federal evidence rules. These exceptions—such as a statement being a party admission, a declaration against interest, or used for impeachment—may allow a recording into evidence. Crucially, the legality of the recording strengthens the argument for it to be admitted under one of these exceptions.

The rules surrounding audio recording and its potential use in litigation are nuanced and complex. William Cooper Law. is here to help, Schedule a consultation.

The post Can I Record A Conversation In New York? appeared first on William Cooper Law..

An experienced business formation lawyer in New Jersey can review your business plans and financial resources to help you select the right structure for your new business. Some business structures that exist include, among others, sole proprietorships, Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), C corporations, S corporations, Limited Partnerships (LPs), Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs), and Professional Corporations (PCs). 

Each type of business structure has its unique advantages and disadvantages. The following sections will therefore examine the fundamental advantages and disadvantages of three primary business forms: the Limited Liability Company, the Corporation, and the Partnership.

Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)

An LLC is a popular and flexible business structure that combines the liability protection of a corporation with the tax benefits and simple formation process of a partnership. 

Advantages of Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)

Limited Liability:

In an LLC,  if the business faces legal action or incurs a debt, the personal finances and assets of the owners (members) are more protected, provided the entity is adequately capitalized, adheres to legal procedures, the owners do not commingle personal and business assets, and are not using the liability shield to commit fraud or injustice. 

These factors are considered by courts when a business with liability protection is sued. In such cases where a court reaches through the liability shield of an LLC to reach the personal assets of the controlling members, the court is said to be piercing the corporate veil.

Flexible Tax Structure:

LLC members can choose a tax structure that is most beneficial based on the needs of their business. An LLC can choose to be taxed as a partnership or a corporation by filing the required forms with the IRS. By electing to be treated as a corporation for tax purposes, the income of the business itself is first taxed and then it is taxed at the individual level. In contrast, when members elect the business to be treated as a partnership, the income is said to pass through the entity and only the owner is taxed. 

The pass-through structure of an LLC partnership is beneficial because it is simplified and avoids double taxation. Whereas the election of corporate status allows for strategic tax planning opportunities. Moreover, while a partnership LLC avoids double taxation, the owner must pay self-employment taxes.

Fewer Formalities And Compliance Requirements:

Forming an LLC requires less paperwork compared to a corporation. The law does not require LLCs to hold mandatory annual meetings or adhere to as stringent record-keeping requirements as corporations. Day-to-day LLC operations are overall more simple and cost-effective. 

Still, there are legal requirements with regard to formation, operations, and ongoing compliance. Some of these include, but are not limited to, filing a certificate of organization with the Department of State, adopting an operating agreement (in some cases), keeping official records in accordance with the operating agreement, and filing annual Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) reports with FinCen. 

Disadvantages Of Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)

Tax Considerations and Raising Capital:

LLC members are subject to self-employment taxes on their profits if they elect partnership treatment, as they are considered both employees and employers. Furthermore, it can be harder for LLCs to raise capital, as they do not have the ability to issue stocks; this makes it harder to attract outside investors. However,  while LLCs can create complex equity structures through their operating agreements, they issue ‘membership interests’ rather than ‘stock.’ 

Venture capital funds and other institutional investors are often more familiar and comfortable with the standardized structure of corporate stock, which can make raising capital from these sources more challenging for an LLC. Additionally, LLCs often require the consent of a majority or all of the members of the LLC, unlike corporations, which can sell stocks more easily. 

Navigating LLC Regulations in Different States Can Be Complicated:

If your LLC operates in multiple states, careful planning and compliance are required to avoid legal issues. To operate in another state, your business must complete several requirements: register as a foreign LLC, check the availability of your name with the Department of State, appoint a registered agent, and obtain a certificate of good standing from your home state. It is important to note, LLC formation regulations and fees can vary from state to state. 

Corporations

A corporation is a type of legal entity that is separate and distinct from its owners (shareholders). A corporation is an artificial person that is capable of owning property in its own name; entering into contracts; incurring debt and other liabilities; and suing and being sued. 

Shareholders of a corporation are generally not liable for the debts and obligations of a corporation, and losses incurred are limited to the value of their investment stock in the company. Management of the entity is vested in the board of directors, which is elected by shareholders. 

The board, in turn, appoints officers to manage the daily affairs of the company. For a business with more than one owner, forming a corporation can protect owners from the actions or misdeeds of other co-owners or management. 

Advantages of Business Incorporation 

Asset Protection:

Sole proprietorships and partnerships may face unlimited personal liability for business debts or litigation. 

If you have to shut down business operations or are a defendant in a lawsuit against your business,  your home,  vehicles, savings, and retirement benefits may be at risk. In a corporation, generally, owners are liable only up to their investment in the business, which provides a significant level of asset protection compared to sole proprietorships and partnerships.

Perpetual Existence:

Corporations have a separate legal existence distinct from their owners that is recognized by the state. If an individual owner,  shareholder,  director, or officer dies or leaves, the corporation can continue to exist and carry on business as usual. 

Disadvantages of Business Incorporation

Extensive Paperwork:

Incorporating a business requires extensive paperwork, including corporate bylaws and Articles of Incorporation, which can take weeks or even months to complete. 

Strict Compliance:

Businesses have to adhere to strict legal requirements and comply with state laws and regulations to maintain their corporate status. 

Most corporations, C corporations in particular, face double taxation. Income from business may be taxed at the entity level as well as the shareholder level. However, if the owners of a business elect to form as an S-corporation, they can avoid being taxed at the entity level, and instead are only taxed personally on any income they earn from the S corporation. 

In order to be considered an S corporation, the business must comply with certain regulations. Failure to do so might mean that your entity is treated as a c corporation for tax purposes.

Less Cost-Effective Compared to Other Business Structure:

Incorporating and running a business is a costly proposition. Paying filing charges, ongoing fees, and substantial taxes can take a severe toll on the financial health of the corporation. 

Raising capital by selling shares is easier for established corporations, while newer businesses may struggle to attract investments.  Newer businesses might find it difficult to attract investments. 

Partnerships

A partnership is a business arrangement in which two or more individuals share ownership. The two main types of partnerships are general partnerships and limited partnerships. 

• In a general partnership, all partners can act on behalf of the business and share equal responsibility for managing the day-to-day affairs of the business. Partners typically make decisions jointly and are personally liable for the debts of the business. 
• In a limited partnership, there are general partners and limited partners.  Limited partners are often investors who do not participate in managing day-to-day operations and have limited liability. The primary advantage for limited partners is that their liability is restricted to the amount of their capital investment.

Advantages Of Partnerships

Simplicity:

Partnerships are relatively easy to form with fewer legal and regulatory requirements. Partnership agreements can outline the terms of the business relationships between partners, such as decision-making rights,  profit sharing, and resolution of disputes among partners. 

A comprehensive partnership agreement is the most critical document for the business’s success and stability. This legally binding contract should be professionally drafted to govern the internal relationship between the partners.

Pass-through Taxation:

Partnerships can file an informational report (Form 1065) but do not have to pay taxes at the partnership level. Partners can benefit from pass-through taxation by reporting profits and losses on their personal tax returns. 

Shared Vision And Expertise:

Partnerships allow like-minded individuals to pool unique skills, perspectives, expertise, and resources, benefiting business growth. . 

Disadvantages Of Partnerships 

Instability and Uncertainty:

Partnerships can dissolve if a partner passes away or decides to leave, unless otherwise specified in the partnership agreement. 

Potential for Disputes:

Differences in business objectives, management styles, and opinions can lead to disputes among partners,  which can disrupt daily operations and affect the future of the business. 

Get Legal Guidance on Choosing the Best Business Structure

Choosing a business structure depends on the unique needs and aspirations of your business. William Cooper Law., will help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of each structure. Schedule a consultation by calling at (646) 970-1345 to decide which business structure aligns with your business objectives and growth plans. 

The post Understanding Business Formation: LLC vs. Corporation vs. Partnership appeared first on William Cooper Law..

We’re proud to share that our founding attorney, William Cooper, was recently featured in Forbes for his analysis of the landmark $8 billion merger between Paramount and Skydance Media. His commentary provided valuable insights into the complex legal and financial structures that made this transformative entertainment industry deal possible.

Featured Commentary on High-Profile Transaction

The Federal Communications Commission’s approval of the Paramount-Skydance merger marked the end of a 383-day regulatory process that will establish Larry Ellison and his son David Ellison as major players in Hollywood’s entertainment landscape. Alex was called upon to explain the sophisticated voting rights arrangements that evolved throughout the approval process.

“From a voting standpoint, David Ellison will be in control through his entities, but the taxable benefits will flow to Larry,” Alex told Forbes, breaking down the strategic restructuring that occurred in mid-July 2024.

Analysis of Strategic Corporate Restructuring

Alex helped readers understand how the deal’s voting structure underwent significant changes during regulatory review. The arrangement evolved from Larry Ellison initially holding all voting and equity shares through his trust, to a final structure giving David Ellison 50% of voting rights in post-merger Paramount, with Larry controlling 27.5%.

Alex explained to Forbes that this restructuring serves multiple important functions:

• Regulatory Requirements: The changes addressed necessary regulatory considerations and follow established patterns in large-scale transactions
• Tax Efficiency: The structure enables profitable businesses to “benefit from any kind of taxable losses or depreciation with this business”
• Operational Balance: David maintains day-to-day control while ensuring appropriate financial benefits flow to the primary equity holder

Understanding Industry-Shaping Deals

This merger creates an entertainment powerhouse encompassing over 1,200 film titles, major channels including MTV, Nickelodeon, Showtime, and CBS News, plus distribution rights to thousands of additional properties. Alex’s analysis helped illuminate how thoughtful corporate structuring enables such significant industry consolidations while addressing regulatory, tax, and operational requirements.

About Us

William Cooper founded William Cooper Law. with extensive experience in mergers and acquisitions, corporate transactions, and entertainment industry matters. His ability to break down complex deal structures has made him a trusted voice for understanding high-profile business transactions.

At William Cooper Law., we provide sophisticated legal counsel to clients navigating complex business deals, with particular focus on mergers and acquisitions, corporate law, and entertainment industry transactions.

Alex’s analysis was featured in Forbes’ coverage of the Paramount-Skydance merger. For guidance on mergers and acquisitions, corporate restructuring, or entertainment industry transactions, we invite you to call us today at (409) 360-3116 for a consultation or send us an email here.

Read the full Forbes article featuring Alex’s commentary

The post Our Founding Attorney Featured in Forbes Analysis of Major Entertainment Merger appeared first on William Cooper Law..